All use cases

Engineering

Form-fill failures → Datadog → bot fix → PR

Website form-fill has an endless long tail of edge cases you never finish by hand.

Share

What hurt

@msfeldstein tip: while building form-filling, every site that failed the fill code logged to Datadog; his Grok Bot watched those logs, fixed the case, and opened a PR — trending toward 100% coverage. Steal the loop: fail → observability event → bot proposes patch → you merge. Tip only. Not affiliated with xAI.

What to install or create

Log each fill failure → bot reads the stream → patch + PR → you review merge.

Bots

  • No new bot. Follow the first-run steps.

Plugins

  • None on day one. Follow the first-run steps.

Routines

  • None on the first run. Watch one manual pass first.

The prompt

This is a tip, not a pasteable system prompt. The author did not publish one. Follow the first-run steps.

First run

  1. 1Read https://x.com/msfeldstein/status/2118486564984721422 (credit @msfeldstein).
  2. 2Point each form-fill failure at one observability sink (Datadog or similar).
  3. 3Give a Grok Bot read access to that failure stream and your form-fill repo.
  4. 4Tell it: on each new failure, propose a fix and open a draft PR — merge nothing.
  5. 5Review and merge only the PRs you trust; watch coverage climb.

Approval fence

Bot may open draft PRs only — never merge, deploy, or touch production credentials without your yes.

What to tweak

Steal fail-to-PR; the long tail closes itself when the bot watches the same log you would.

Source

Michael Feldstein @msfeldstein · Original post

Not affiliated with xAI. We did not write this prompt. Third-party template terms still apply.

Browse templates

Browse team blueprints

Pro pack

Want the full setup, not just the idea?

Pro packs give you the job text, prompts, schedules and pitfalls for popular use-cases.

See Pro